Photo by Josh Sorenson on Pexels.com
A glimpse into U2’s collective carbon footprint from Helen Roberts of carbonfootprint.com has sparked controversy among environmentalists.
This year alone, the world-renowned band’s tour (from 44 shows) is reportedly emitting the equivalent carbon footprint of a return flight to Mars. According to guardian.co.uk, U2 will create enough carbon to fly all 90,000 people attending one of their Wembley dates (in London) to Dublin… Isn’t Bono supposed to be an environmentalist?
What can you do to lighten your own ‘entertainment footprint’? Sometimes it’s a necessary evil in order to explore the country (and certainly the globe) that you release some emissions. That’s a no-brainer. But there’s always an opportunity to take steps and offset your footprint to help the greater good.
Is it worth it for the sake of entertainment and exploration? Sure, sometimes. Though I personally feel better about heading to the TLA in Philadelphia to enjoy live music (where I can take public transportation instead of making a more damaging trek to a bigger venue farther away.)
But what about the artist’s trail? Do you think musicians like U2 and lesser-known bands should be more concerned about their environmental impact while touring? Would it stop you from seeing a band you like? Let us know by commenting below.
Posted by Beth
Councilmember Nicolas O’Rourke discusses affordability and access to green initiatives in our latest Civic Catalyst…
Let's sail-ebrate the latest changemakers who are moving the region towards a sustainable, equitable place.…
Catch up on the latest sustainability news: Community Farm gets closer to community ownership. The…
Philadelphia residents will not only vote on who will be the next district attorney, but…
Catch up on the latest sustainability news: Transit advocates demand better SEPTA funding. On Tuesday…
Part Two of Every Voice, Every Vote research revealed that Philly takes pride in community…